GLMA board approves Nursing Section!

The board of directors of GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBT Equality unanimously approved the formation of a section specifically for nurses, with details to be finalized over the next few months. The organization has taken this step not only to meet the needs of its growing nursing membership but also its interdisciplinary membership as a whole as a means to assure critical inter-professional collaboration to address the GLMALogoBlue3healthcare needs of LGBT individuals. Sections are a new concept for GLMA, designed to allow members from specific healthcare professions to convene and address LGBT health concerns relevant to their discipline. Stay tuned for a formal announcement with more details about the GLMA nursing section and GLMA sections generally in the coming months.

There are a couple of ways to stay connected to this very exciting new venture!

  • Join us on September 10 for the GLMA Nursing Summit in Baltimore, immediately preceding the GLMA conference being held through September 13.  This will be the second year of the Summit, and once again will be an all-day event that will be focused on actions to promote and encourage greater inclusion of LGBT health issues in nursing education, research, practice and policy.  We will also take the first formal steps in establishing the GLMA nursing section.  Plan to be there!
  • Join the GLMA nursing google email list!  We will be posting details about the formation of the nursing section on this email list, so sign up today to receive the latest information as it happens!

The GLMA web site is a rich resource for all health care providers and LGBT individuals and families.  For example, there is a Directory of Providers who are welcoming of LGBT patients, and resources for advocacy on behalf of LGBT health. If you are a healthcare provider who wants to be part of a multi-disciplinary movement to improve healthcare for LGBT patients and families, join GLMA!

 

Posted in Activism, Events | Tagged , | Leave a comment

#GetCovered

Today marks the first time I have ever used a hash tag, but this topic is extremely lgbt_aca_benefits-508x1024important to the LGBT health. The Obama administration has helped end discrimination against LGBT Americans, such as repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and standing up against DOMA. His administration’s other notable accomplishment is passing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which has the potential to transform LGBT help. The ACA provides an option to affordable health insurance for LGBT Americans, and requires insurers to provide preventive care and certain screenings at no extra cost. Additionally, the ACA bans discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, and prohibits companies from discriminating against people with pre-existing conditions. Regardless of your political affiliation or viewpoint on the Obama administration, the ACA has the potential to provide health care to many LGBT Americans who previously did not have health insurance.

#GetCovered

For more information, visit:

www.healthcare.gov or call 1-800-318-2596

www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/12/17/how-obamacare-helps-lgbt-community

Posted in Affordable Care Act, LGBTQ rights, Public Policy | Tagged , | 2 Comments

New article on Cassandra just published!

check this out!

Peggy L Chinn's avatarPeggy L Chinn

Elizabeth Berrey and I have an article that was just published in Sinister Wisdom titled 1-1_Nov_1982s_pdf“Cassandra: Lesbian (Non)Presence in Nursing!”  We were delighted to have this opportunity to document some of Cassandra’s history, while at the same time reflecting on what that experience meant to us!

For those wondering what that experience was, in 1982 a group of nurses at the American Nurses Association convention in Washington, DC, formed Cassandra: Radical Feminist Nurses Network.  We were gathered at the end of June, at the same time as the June 30th, 1982 “death” of the ERA.  Women and men from all over the country were gathered in the nation’s capitol to grieve the loss of that amendment, but also to express a commitment to move forward.  There were celebrations, concerts, demonstrations all over the district, and then there was the ANA convention.  For those of us present at the convention…

View original post 195 more words

Posted in Join the discussion | Leave a comment

How Safe Is Oral Sex?

Readers of a certain age will recall having learned in the mid-1990s, thanks to U.S. President Bill “I Did Not Have Sex with That Woman” Clinton, that oral sex was not sex. Beyond semantic quibbling, this perception has been documented among adolescents and young adults (Tanne, 2005). More to the point, the same population views oral sex as safe sex.

But how “safe” is oral sex? To mark STD Awareness Month, in this article I examine the state of knowledge concerning oral sex and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), considering both bacterial and viral STDs as well as HIV. In general, the evidence is clear that unprotected oral sex (particularly for the partner who is performing fellatio [giving a blow job to a male] or cunnilingus [performing oral sex on a female]) is not safe and incurs a risk of bacterial or viral STDs. Infection can occur even without ejaculation by an infected male. (Just because he doesn’t “cum” in your mouth, doesn’t protect you.) In addition, symptoms and health effects of STDs may differ for males and females.

Many bacteria and viruses thrive in warm, moist places, and few places provide as ideal a growth medium as the vagina and urethra and the mouth and throat. The fact that their tissue consists of mucous membranes, which are more porous than the skin on the surface of the body, can also make them portals for infectious microbes.

Oral Sex & Bacterial STDs

The chief bacterial STDs include those associated with syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia, which can be tested with blood tests or swabs and treated with antibiotics. Left untreated these bacterial STDs can cause serious, even permanent, health complications. Gonorrhea and chlamydia are quite common, as well as often being asymptomatic.

Centers for Disease Control, Syphilis Fact Sheet

http://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/STDFact-Syphilis-detailed.htm

Centers for Disease Control, Gonorrhea Fact Sheet

http://www.cdc.gov/std/Gonorrhea/STDFact-gonorrhea-detailed.htm

Centers for Disease Control, Chlamydia Fact Sheet

http://www.cdc.gov/std/chlamydia/STDFact-Chlamydia-detailed.htm

Oral Sex & Viral STDs

Viral infections by oral sex can include herpes, hepatitis, and human papillomavirus (HPV). Herpes is often asymptomatic and does not usually entail serious health complications, but it comes with associated stigma and shame as a result of its appearance in oral or genital sores. Viral hepatitis is a leading cause of liver cancer, with several distinct forms of the virus. HAV is less likely to be transmitted by oral sex unless one is engaging in oral-anal contact (i.e., “rimming”). HBV is found in blood and in lesser concentrations in body fluids like semen and vaginal secretions; fortunately a vaccine exists to prevent infection, which sexually active people should receive. HCV is less likely to be sexually transmitted. While HPV is commonly associated with cervical cancer in women, males can also be infected. Performing oral sex on an infected person puts one at risk for oropharyngeal (mouth and throat) cancer.

Centers for Disease Control, Herpes Fact Sheet

http://www.cdc.gov/std/herpes/stdfact-herpes-detailed.htm

Centers for Disease Control, Hepatitis B Information

http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/HBV/index.htm

Centers for Disease Control, HPV Information

http://www.cdc.gov/std/HPV/STDFact-HPV.htm

Oral Sex & HIV

Unprotected anal sex is a well established route of HIV infection, but what about oral sex? Theoretically, performing oral sex on an HIV-infected person is a less-safe but not necessarily unsafe practice. Unless there are tears or sores, the mouth and throat are not hospitable to HIV, which typically needs direct access to the bloodstream. According to the CDC, “Receiving fellatio, giving or receiving cunnilingus, and giving or receiving anilingus carry little to no risk. The highest oral sex risk is to individuals performing fellatio on an HIV-infected man, with ejaculation.” However, a literature search conducted for me by Valori Banfi, nursing librarian at the University of Connecticut, in 2013 suggests a much more complex landscape in which research findings are ambiguous:

The risk of HIV transmission from an infected partner through oral sex is much less than the risk of HIV transmission from anal or vaginal sex. Measuring the exact risk of HIV transmission as a result of oral sex is very difficult. Additionally, because most sexually active individuals practice oral sex in addition to other forms of sex, such as vaginal and/or anal sex, when transmission occurs, it is difficult to determine whether or not it occurred as a result of oral sex or other more risky sexual activities. Finally, several co-factors may increase the risk of HIV transmission through oral sex, including: oral ulcers, bleeding gums, genital sores, and the presence of other STDs. What is known is that HIV has been transmitted through fellatio, cunnilingus, and anilingus. (CDC, 2013)

Centers for Disease Control, HIV & Oral Sex

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/behavior/oralsex.html

Conclusions

Performing oral sex entails risks whose calculation becomes complicated when you don’t know the health status of your partner. It is also often the case that partners themselves don’t know their own health status since many STDs are asymptomatic. Some risks may be managed by pharmaceuticals after infection, but many, particularly viral infections, cannot.

If you enjoy casual or anonymous oral sex with multiple partners over time, consider safer-sex, using condoms or dental dams for oral sex, and other risk reduction practices (e.g., mutual masturbation in lieu of oral sex).

Get tested for STDs regularly, either through your regular primary care provider or a public clinic, like those provided by Planned Parenthood.

 References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2013. Oral sex and HIV risk.” Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/behavior/oralsex.html

Tanne, J. H. (2005). US teenagers think oral sex isn’t real sex. British Medical Journal, 330(7496), 865. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC556150/

Posted in LGBT Health | 3 Comments

Name that “ism”

Changing the Game in Reporting of Health Disparities

Many of us were drawn to health careers because we wanted to improve the lives of people in our communities. Our social justice orientations keep us engaged and fighting for the nation’s health in spite of budget cuts that threaten preventative services and health care safety nets for vulnerable populations. Public health and other health discipline’s journals and conferences often focus on social justice and health disparities.

Yet, our research reports often fall short of truly identifying the upstream social determinants of health and directly and honestly addressing health disparities. All too often, research reports rely on atheoretical research designs that examine associations between health outcomes and some human characteristic(s). These fishing expeditions for correlates of poor health, of course, sometimes yield surprising findings, but too often, the conclusions drawn are reported as:

“sexual orientation is a risk factor for (fill-in-the-blank health problem)”
“minority racial/ethnic identification was associated with lower income”
“gender was a predictor of slower job advancement”
“the lowest income group had the highest rates of obesity”

In these examples, it is most likely that sexual orientation, racial/ethnic identity, and gender were proxies for heterosexism, racism, sexism, and classism, and not the cause or contributor to the health issue. Without a theoretical framework in which to view identities, minority or majority, we can unintentionally blame the individual who has that identity for any social shortcomings (less educated) or health problems (those poor people have terrible diets). If we truly embrace an ecological view of the world, we should not tolerate simplistic and incomplete statements that link individual identities to health outcomes in direct fashion, but insist that our own research reports complicate these relationships. If we at least place our research questions within the larger context of a theoretical framework, we can show how our findings support or challenge those theories, without making sweeping and inaccurate generalizations such as “lesbian identity is a risk factor for obesity.” We would make sure that our study design accounted for or included measures of heterosexism and sexism, or we clearly outline why we are not measuring those critical factors. We take care in how we frame our conclusions so that right wing politicians do not take them as evidence that immigrants, women, people of color, LGBTQ folks, poor people, and others already at the bottom of the heap, are blamed for their poor health and punished by policies that even further limit their access to quality health care.
So I am calling for us to “name the ism” when we report health disparities and not inadvertently contribute to our own oppression.

Posted in Best practices, Overcoming "isms", Research methods | 1 Comment